Staff Software Engineer (AI Evals)
Company shown to members 🔒 · Remote · Location not stated
Apply free: 3 jobs are on us✨ Tailor my resume for this job🎤 Practise the interview question, free
✓ Straight from the company's own careers page. No middlemen, no “we'll send you a check for equipment”. How we check jobs
✓ Sent 100 applications and heard nothing? Make this one count: tailor your resume to this ad in one tap, free.
✨ Not sure this is the one? Get your remote job matches in 30 seconds →
First recorded by Psst: 21 October 2026. Your first 3 jobs are free to apply to (the first right away, 2 more with your email). After that, the company and the apply link are for Psst members, from $4.99 for 7 days.
Practise the first interview question for this job
If the company replies, the first call usually starts with a question like this. Vague answers are the easiest to reject. Write yours and get an AI score in under a minute.
The 20-second read
- Experience
- Senior
- Where you can live
- Location not stated
- Skills and tools
- python, javascript, typescript
- Job type
- Full-time
Read from the ad by Psst's rules. Check the full ad below before applying.
Job details
- Where you can work
- Location not stated
- Employment type
- Full-time
- Advertised pay
- $100–200/hr
- Experience
- Senior
- Employer publication date
- 20 October 2026
- First recorded by Psst
- 21 October 2026
- Last checked at the source
- 10 November 2026
About the job
STAFF SOFTWARE ENGINEER (AI EVALS)
Contract | $100–$200/hour | 20-40 hrs/week | Start ASAP
We’re looking for highly experienced software engineer to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.
This is not a traditional engineering role.
You won’t be writing production code.
You’ll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.
WHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS
You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios — focusing on:
- Whether the response makes sense
- Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful
- Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment
- Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer
This role is about engineering taste — not syntax correctness.
WHAT YOU’LL BE DOING
- Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end-to-end
- Judge whether outputs are:
- Useful
- Correct (at a high level)
- Aligned with how a strong engineer would think
- Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just code
- Distinguish between different levels of response quality (e.g. what makes something a 2 vs 4)
- Provide clear, opinionated feedback on:
- What worked
- What didn’t
- What felt “off” or misleading
- Help define what great looks like when interacting with tools like Cursor
WHAT WE MEAN BY “TASTE”
We’re specifically looking for engineers who can answer questions like:
- Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?
- Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?
- Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?
- Would this interaction build or erode trust?
You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments.
WHO YOU ARE
- Staff / Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)
- Strong background in one of the below:
- Go
- Python
- Rust
- TypeScript / JavaScript
- Hands-on experience using:
- OpenAI Codex
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows
- Able to evaluate code without needing to fully execute or deeply review every line
- Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback
- High bar for what “good engineering” looks like
NICE TO HAVE
- Experience with tools like Cursor or similar AI-first IDEs
- Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows
- Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards
ENGAGEMENT DETAILS
- Rate: $100–$200/hour
- Hours: ~20 hours+
- Duration: Through October w/possible extentions
- Start: ASAP
- Process:
- Take-home evaluation exercise
- Background Check
- Offer
Apply free: 3 jobs are on us✨ Tailor my resume for this jobPrepare with the Apply kitMore remote software engineer jobs →
Posted recently with nothing unusual.
Signals, not proof. Check the company's page before you spend time on it.Similar remote jobs
- Software Engineer, AI DataLocation not stated
- Senior / Staff Platform Software EngineerLocation not stated
- Head of AILocation not stated
- Staff Software Engineer (Backend Engineer – Golang | 7+ Years of Experience)Location not stated
- Prompt Engineer (LLM Systems, Evals & Safety)Location not stated
Explore more jobs
A resume that gets past the first 6 seconds
Recruiters skim. The Psst resume coach fixes what makes them skip you, line by line, and one tap tailors it to the exact job you're applying to.
- 1Every line checkedWeak starts, clichés and AI-sounding phrases flagged, with a 3-question fix.
- 2Tailored to the jobSee which skills and tools from the ad your resume is missing. Try it free on one of your matches.
- 3Ready for remoteTime zone, tools and proof you work on your own, the things remote teams look for.
- 4Looks the partOne page, 6 designs, 8 colours and a matching cover letter, free to build. Premium downloads the PDF and Word files.
Example with made-up details. The score is the builder's own check, not an ATS rating or a promise of an interview.